

I mean if everyone involved has concented to forfeiting someone’s life, then I guess there’s no issue. Though I’d prefer to be the shitbox driver in this case
Eipäs


I mean if everyone involved has concented to forfeiting someone’s life, then I guess there’s no issue. Though I’d prefer to be the shitbox driver in this case
Out of those I don’t think the dead animal aspect of it really figures into it. If they like fishing (or hunting, same deal there), then they probably wouldn’t be compatible with someone who is upset by fishing or hunting pics for the dead animals
a friend
Right. About that… I’m writing that in a jokey way but a lot of men don’t have that kind of friends or don’t feel comfortable asking to just take a picture for that specific reason or just for the sake of getting a pic.
It’s silly but it’s a legit hangup some have. So it’s again either a fish pic (“hey at least I’m smiling in that one and it’s not a super awkward selfie”). I get their reasoning
I honestly wouldn’t even have come up with this scenario at that age, had to have it actually happen
Sad that you can’t be as comfortable next to her?
I don’t think there’s anything like that in it. A lot of men just don’t take a lot if any photos of themselves. Catching a good sized fish is one of the rare occasions and you are usually smiling and happy in that one.


But in this case there’s already a lot worse system in place. Why not get a better system while also fighting the verification thing?


They’re already doing the verification and it’s not going away. I definitely prefer a better way to do it


Have the app you use to verify scan it so it can sanitize it


I don’t know exactly what you mean, I just think for age gating there’s ways that are a lot better


The QR/one time code way makes a lot more sense and avoids this issue
Same for secret mushroom spot
Not sure why I’d want to dirty up my clothes even more before a wash