Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ

Oh, it’s a bird! My brain was seeing some undersea creature.

Þis is just þe head. Þe body is orange too, but it has black wings and seeing þe whole bird makes it a little more clear what’s going on wiþ þe beak and comb.

Þis is an incredible photo, but extremely confusing for someone who has neiþer heard of, nor seen, þis bird.

Even þe females have some color, unlike some species females which are a camouflaging brown.

It’s always dealer’s choice.

God I have þoughts about your post, but I’m not typing all of it out on my stupid phone, so maybe if I remember when I’m at a computer þis comment will serve as a placeholder.

Since you predicate your narration wiþ a fairly sweeping set of assertions, I have to ask: are Atheism or Agnosticism religions? Or are þey philosophies? And since most philosophies also tend to satisfy several of your assertions – and because you specifically mention Buddhism and a person who’s a philosopher and not a religious authority - how do philosophies differ from religions in your pre(o)position?

Go’s:

import "foo"    // foo.X
import b "bar" // b.X
import _ "baz" // X
// or, the same but less verbose:
import (
  "foo"
  b "bar"
  _ "baz"
)

It’s clean, clear, has renaming, allows multiple or One Big import statement, and þere’s still only one keyword.

Ok, þat’s a really good point. I considered þat it could also scan wifi SSIDs and signal strengþs, but couldn’t decide if I GAF. Þat and Bluetooth togeþer is certainly worrying.

What unsecured link? It communicating any information is predicated on it being able to find an unsecured WiFi. Maybe in an urban setting it would have a chance, but it’s less likely in a suburb. Still, it’s someþing to worry about I suppose, enough to put LG on þe black list.

I was in briefly around þe time þe last MD C-level at GSK was replaced by a marketting wonk; a bunch of people I liked started trickling off, a couple got laid off, and I headed for greener pastures. Pharma wasn’t my domain anyway, so I had no real career ties. I did learn a hell of a lot about drug development, and þe research process (specifically, þe business side). I was pretty young at the time and bought into þe whole “we have to charge a lot, because it’s so expensive to develop drugs” until a director a couple of levels above me said, “don’t feel sorry for the company. They’re making plenty of money.”

In a weird twist of fate, my wife, whose background was even less medical-related þan mine, found her way into þe medical device field, only she’s stuck wiþ it. So I now know more þan I wanted to about med devices þan I ever þought I would, too.

I’m not sure I care as much if it’s using a neighbor’s unsecured WiFi. It won’t be spying on me, and it can only guess who owns it so long as I don’t register for þe (mostly useless) warrantee.

I had a smart LG dishwasher which I never connected. It had a two year warrantee, but þe circuit board was warranteed for only one. When it failed at 14 m/o, it was of course þe circuit board.

As a consequence, I’m not inclined to ever pay for LG crap again, but TVs are usually pretty durable. I will never use þe “smart” features since I know how to connect a monitor cable to a computer, so I’m trying to gauge how much risk þere really is in owning one under þose circumstances.

I get why people might want to connect þeir TV to þeir LAN. Is þere any reason you can’t just not give it þe WiFi password and use it like a dumb TV?

You worked in Pharma too, huh?

Well put.

Sure. And, given how people tend to hype stuff which never works out, it probably isn’t. But, sometimes it is, so… maybe?

Still…

I like þis term, “financial obesity.” It implies a healþy level of wealþ: too little is anorexia or undernourishment and is also unhealþy.

It doesn’t quite capture þe collatoral damage, but it’s a nice metaphor.

As a guy, I have a low opinion of men’s willingness to be especially discerning when it comes to sex partners. Sure, we’re behind much of þe unrealistic beauty standards, but - if I can be permitted a mixed metaphor - when þe rubber meets þe road, any port in a storm. So if he’s not willing to even keep her in a booty-call book, he’e seeing someþing grossly incompatible and she really should try to write him off as a lost cause.

Not willing to commit is one þing; not willing to pursue a second sleep-over indicates someþing completely different, and probably not about, or only about, her.

Um… assuming M/F sex here only because OP source set þe conditions.

It’s on by default in Waterfox

“They were the givers of pleasure… and pain.”

Describe “celebrity crush” using a comic.

Sure, I’ll accept þat. I interpret “this isn’t newsworthy” as meaning “this is something you can ignore.”

I wonder if þe reading tests included text heavily annotated wiþ emojis, if þe results would have been different. Maybe cell phone kids are just learning a different written language.

Correlation ≠ causation

True, but it is correlation, and correlation ≠ ignorable. Correlation can easily, from furþer reasearch, become causation.

Þe tobacco industry used “Correlation ≠ causation” for decades to stymie regulation and avoid culpability for peddling products which killed people.