

They really should just remove the camera


They really should just remove the camera


What a time to be alive
Also why is no one talking about the fact that they made the young women skinnier. Young women already feel have unrealistic expectations without AI in the mix.


Unless you only work a half week


300 EUR is a lot of money depending on who you are


XMPP died along side XML. Outside of a few greybeards no one really uses it. I’m not sure why Lemmy seems to be so obsessed with a dead technology


I would be very careful with it as it has a long history of being unstable and hasn’t had a security audit.
Honesty my recommendation would be to use Signal or Molly. While it isn’t the best from a anonymity perspective it is reliable and easy to understand and use


This is both concerning and surprising especially since China is already low on women thanks to its one child policy.


True but if you look online Chrome OS devices are dirt cheap. The major trade off is that storage is limited


I would instead look into old Chromeboxes. They have about the same compute but don’t have a battery and can typically run mainline Linux (assuming they are supported by mrchromebox)


That is impressively bad


It probably stems from the same source


Then there is “nice night”


The transparency logs would mean that any rouge certificates created would leave a paper trail not to mention there is nothing stopping them from issuing a certificate for any domain of their choosing


You go to a different CA


You do make a good point. However, Let’s encrypt is run by the IRSG which is a non profit focused on improving internet security. They are the ones who are pushing for shorter certificate lifetimes among other things.


ZeroSSL is probably what OP is looking for


Maybe I’m mistaken but aren’t the logs cryptography verifiable? (As in you can’t create a rouge cert without it creating a trace)


Let’s encrypt is very transparent and has been designed to be auditable. What are you worried about exactly?


Lost Lemmings?
It is a really poor design choice to tie the smart screen to the core function of the refrigerator. They apparently haven’t heard of the idea of fail safe.