Update: Here is my current corrected version (do not trust blindly, I had typos involved too!)

#!/usr/bin/env bash

TEMPDIR="$(mktemp -d)"
mkdir --verbose -- "${TEMPDIR}/tests"
trap 'cd -- "${TEMPDIR}/tests" && rm --verbose --one-file-system -rf "${TEMPDIR:-/invalid/615e1a5d}/tests"; cd ..; rmdir --verbose -- "${TEMPDIR}"' EXIT

And an alternative variant in case there are only files without subdirectories involved under “tests”:

trap 'cd -- "${TEMPDIR}/tests" && rm --verbose --one-file-system -f -- "${TEMPDIR:-/invalid/615e1a5d}/tests/"*; cd ..; rmdir --verbose -- tests "${TEMPDIR}"' EXIT

Note, I use --verbose to explicitly list files, because this is for my Test system. If you copy this construct to use in your own normal scripts, you might want to remove the verbose flags for normal usage.

Down below is old version:

This is just a little small question if this is secure. This script is used to create a fresh test environment that should get deleted when script ends. trap command solves that issue fine. However, I am very, very afraid of doing rm -rf in context of variables, in case the variable happens to become empty due to user error (or later changes in script). So I will do this in multiple steps.

#!/usr/bin/env bash

TEMPDIR="$(mktemp -d)"
mkdir -f -- "${TEMPDIR}/tests"
trap 'cd -- "${TEMPDIR}/tests" && rm -rf tests && cd .. && rmdir -- ${TEMPDIR}' EXIT

# Here follows the script content, creating temporary files and manipulating them...
  1. Use a subdirectory, so the variable is not used by itself. So we have to use ${TEMPDIR}/tests each time instead just ${TEMPDIR}.
  2. When removing all files recursively, first enter into directory with cd, and only if that was successful delete all files recursively with a specific directory name. This should make sure that rm -rf is only executed if the temporary directory even exist and the variable is not resolved to empty.
  3. Off course go up one dir again and then remove the empty directory with rmdir, which will only remove empty directories.

I personally feel confident that this construct is safe, but would like to hear your opinions. Maybe I missed something important. It would be devastating. I don’t want to try out various ways to see if one of them is working correctly.

Edit: For anyone who does not create uncontrolled temporary directories, they could just use rm -f tests/* instead, so nothing is deleted recursively. I may go that route and avoid sub-directories in my test folder.

  • arthropod_shift@programming.dev
    2·
    2 days ago

    I generally dislike using the set methods to change how the “language” works. So even if it covers my issue, I’m not using it.

    If you don’t feel like using it, that’s valid, just as long as you’re aware of the functionality. It seemed fitting here to me because of the potential to simplify the code from a complex chain of commands with hard-coded values to a single command with no hard-coding, while keeping the old behavior.

    Also if cd -> rm -rf -> rmdir solves it, why would I need to rewrite and change it to set -u -> rm -rf?

    You don’t. You asked for feedback, though, so I gave some.

    In general, I’m a fan of set -u because it helps to avoid some common scripting bugs, but if you’re aware of the option and how it could be used, and you choose not to use it, then I’m not going to insist you write it how I would write it.