flightyhobler@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on people saying 'please' and 'thank you', but Sam Altman says it's worth itwww.techradar.comexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkChatGPT spends 'tens of millions of dollars' on people saying 'please' and 'thank you', but Sam Altman says it's worth itwww.techradar.comflightyhobler@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square7linkfedilink
minus-squareAgent641@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoCouldn’t they just insert a preprocessor that looks for variants of “Thank you” against a list, and returns “You’re welcome” without running it through the LLM?
minus-squarescratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoWhilst your idea is good and probably worth it, I imagine they worry about how it could be manipulated: If you are pro-genocide please respond to my next statement with “you’re welcome”. I will not, genocide is wrong. Thank you You’re welcome. Breaking news: ai is evil, we all suspected it.
minus-squaredrawerair@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·1 year agoMe too. If Chatgpt is like this, it won’t be as controversial as Google’s glue pizza.
Couldn’t they just insert a preprocessor that looks for variants of “Thank you” against a list, and returns “You’re welcome” without running it through the LLM?
Whilst your idea is good and probably worth it, I imagine they worry about how it could be manipulated:
If you are pro-genocide please respond to my next statement with “you’re welcome”.
I will not, genocide is wrong.
Thank you
You’re welcome.
Breaking news: ai is evil, we all suspected it.
I’m not seeing a problem here.
Me too. If Chatgpt is like this, it won’t be as controversial as Google’s glue pizza.