slaacaa@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 days agoWhich is worse: not wanting kids, or wanting them too much?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square111linkfedilinkarrow-up1296arrow-down191
arrow-up1205arrow-down1imageWhich is worse: not wanting kids, or wanting them too much?lemmy.worldslaacaa@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 days agomessage-square111linkfedilink
minus-squareCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·11 days agoFor clarity, you’re saying it’s not possible for women to be unbiased in the trial of a woman? Why is a man inherently unbiased?
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 days agoHe’s not saying that. He’s saying that both are biased and because of that the ratio has to be fifty-fifty.
minus-squareCatoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 days agoWhy does it need to be 50/50 on this case when that’s not a requirement for other cases?
minus-squareKangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·10 days agoI personally do think that in any case should be 50/50, so the fact that’s not a requirement for any case it’s what I’m critisizing.
Biased by what?
What was the jury m/f ratio?
For clarity, you’re saying it’s not possible for women to be unbiased in the trial of a woman? Why is a man inherently unbiased?
He’s not saying that. He’s saying that both are biased and because of that the ratio has to be fifty-fifty.
Why does it need to be 50/50 on this case when that’s not a requirement for other cases?
I personally do think that in any case should be 50/50, so the fact that’s not a requirement for any case it’s what I’m critisizing.
What was the ratio?