• observes_depths@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    That doesn’t sound like the sort of ai we need to worry about. If it’s light weight, doesn’t involve 3rd parties, no privacy violations for starters.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      From this PR it looks like they are doing setup for future / present “agentic coding”. Skills are markdown documents you feed to chatbot “agents” so that you can run different operations with a chatbot with the project in context so that you don’t have to include all of your preferences in the prompt when doing common actions.

      If you have a blanket prohibition of slopware, you should care about this. If you don’t, then 🤷.

      • misterred@feddit.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        YES. That the threat, even if benign, of opening up explicitly to agentic slopping is real, is my feeling & understanding, thanks. I’m so glad that I have the documented historical perspective mostly from having read one book, yeah I know, but for those interested in the history I urge folks to read ‘The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI’ by Cory Doctorow.

      • TooManyGames@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t really think a blanket prohibition on anything AI related is useful. This doesn’t really ring like anything problematic.