With the rise of cancel culture, it’s something that’s got me curious, why are so many works (music, literature, tv shows, etc.) no longer separated from their controversial makers? Is it purely to do with money (e.g. not wanting to give money to people you don’t agree with?) and what about controversial people who are dead? They don’t gain anything, so why isn’t the art separated from the artist? What’s your opinion on this topic?

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I very much do. Mostly accidentally by simply not knowing/caring what shitty thing they might have done. But even when I know, I can still enjoy the art.

    • Cyril Strobe@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Funny how it bothers some people, and others simply don’t care, considering the rise of cancel culture in the past couple of decades.