• TootSweet@lemmy.world
    shield
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yeah, not a good thing to plant invasive species. As an alternative, I’ll suggest planting protected species (and making sure local authorities know they’re there) where there’s a likelihood of data centers being built. Just as much headache for data centers, not destructive to the planet.

    I’m going to sticky this comment and lock the post. Hopefully folks will see the lock and come looking for the reason and that’ll lead them to this stickied post.

    (Lemmy doesn’t let me edit the post title or anything like that.)

  • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Do. Not. Plant. Destructive. Invasive. Species.

    I’m all for tearing them down but destroying our environment is not the way

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Knotweed is an incredibly invasive species in the US. Do not plant it anywhere as it facilitates the destruction of ecosystems that it is not native to.

    Plant willow trees, 😉

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Destroying general purpose infrastructure to harm a consumer is predominantly harming those users that won’t be able to afford the service due to shortages.

    Also destroying infrastructure that’s particularly harmful to produce causes that harm to happen again. There is more effective forms of protest that are more directly attributable to protest instead of just causing a diffuse cost.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The data center push is not for our benefit. It’s to provide compute and storage for AI mass surveillance. I’m against the use of invasive species to combat them, but destruction and disruption will have a positive effect.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Data centers are general purpose, they have a specific job. It’s not the same as if say plotting to disrupt a power grid. And trying to protect everyone while weaning people off things that harm the environment is a lose/lose battle, unfortunately. We’ve gotten ourselves into a corner with being dependent on things that have no lower redundancies.

      I’m more against this for the other reason given in the replies. Even if it worked, now there’s more of an invasive species that is going to be a problem later on, as we’ve done repeatedly in the past with well-meaning introductions of plants and animals.

      You’re correct that they will just repair/rebuild if nothing else is done. But passive protests don’t seem to stop that. What’s your suggestions?