• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 days ago

    How’s opsec going to help against a rat anyway? If an insider gives out information, you’re toast anyway, unless you have some kind of a cell network going on like some terrorist organizations and that’s, uh, a bit too much for organizing an union

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      OpSec includes vetting people and structuring your organization in a way that frustrates a rat’s ability to gain access to sensitive information.

      Having a structured internal network for the union isn’t “a bit much”, it’s a basic necessity to proper organization.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        And yet - if the people organizing are completely anonymous and you can’t even know for sure they’re your coworkers, would you trust them?

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you’re allowing anonymous people into your private server you have failed in your OpSec.

          The solution to this is to not allow anonymous people into a private server used for organizing. You vet them first before giving access. Basic OpSec 101.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Like saying how is a fire extinguisher going to help a house fire.

      Point is, good opsec prevents it from becoming a house fire.

    • vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      SimpleX makes you anonymous and messages can’t be attributed to you. HR would probably believe screenshots still. If people identify themselves on the chat, and they don’t have to.