I liked some proposals. I will certainly use LLM far more, and i/o too. But that’s me, I have a preference toward technical terms that are already established. Finding new ones is a challenge. Specialy since they get permeated by our own biases. Or at least that’s what I felt when reading their proposal to replace ai agent. I believe the agency of that system is there, so why not just llm agent? :/
I liked some proposals. I will certainly use LLM far more, and i/o too. But that’s me, I have a preference toward technical terms that are already established. Finding new ones is a challenge. Specialy since they get permeated by our own biases. Or at least that’s what I felt when reading their proposal to replace ai agent. I believe the agency of that system is there, so why not just llm agent? :/