eicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWhy Europe has been absent from the great AI safety debate: shun the technology and lose out on growth; or embrace it and become dependent on tools developed by the US and China.www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square29linkfedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down16
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkWhy Europe has been absent from the great AI safety debate: shun the technology and lose out on growth; or embrace it and become dependent on tools developed by the US and China.www.theguardian.comeicker@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square29linkfedilink
minus-squareHolytimes@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 days agoThen you have either literally not even tried to look, or are objectively ignoring reality in favor of personal biases and possibly xenophobia. There’s plenty of issues, water problems, power problems, ethical concerns, etc. But claiming there’s been no productivity, growth or progress caused by LLM technology is objectively wrong. It’s like claiming that nuclear research brought zero benefits just because you disagree with nukes. It’s objectively on every level, retarded as fuck.
Then you have either literally not even tried to look, or are objectively ignoring reality in favor of personal biases and possibly xenophobia.
There’s plenty of issues, water problems, power problems, ethical concerns, etc.
But claiming there’s been no productivity, growth or progress caused by LLM technology is objectively wrong.
It’s like claiming that nuclear research brought zero benefits just because you disagree with nukes.
It’s objectively on every level, retarded as fuck.