• Tolc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    “democrats” “fighting for worker rights”, are we doing this in big 26? No wonder american left is dead.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Who do you propose to stand up? Orange lunatic team sure isn’t, if you look long enough, they’re helping bleed us dry.

      It is a weird bill, maybe it’s a scare tactic.

  • just2look@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It seems like they will just mark everything up by 10% and then give that discount at self checkout. So they will pocket even more while harming those who don’t use self checkout.

    Or eliminating cashiers altogether.

    • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It also doesn’t really make sense to do it as a percentage. A cashier’s wage is typically hourly, and the labor market has settled on a particular wage for cashiers in this area - say $15/hr.

      If I have a $150 grocery bill, a 10% discount would be $15. For maybe 5 minutes of work. Working out to an hourly wage of $180/hr (60/5 = 12, 12 * 15 = 180).

      So if they’re saying “we should be compensating customers for being made to do labor”, they’d be compensating them at roughly 12x the going rate for cashiers in this example.

      Now if it’s just meant to be punitive, OK. But then why not actually address the real issue: displacement of workers by technology and passing the labor burden on to unpaid consumers - either make that illegal or tax the company to help mitigate the harm it’s causing by eliminating jobs.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For the last point, it is easier to tax unfavored behavior into the ground than it is to outright forbid it. That’s why sin taxes exist after all.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think it would be difficult to outright forbid self-checkout at all, actually.

          There’s a difference between enforcing laws on individuals and enforcing laws on businesses. Businesses can’t exactly run and hide, if they’re using self-checkout they’re going to get found out. That’s distinct from something like the drug trade, which is all underground and hidden.

          • teslekova@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Some people fucking love self checkout. If you ban it, you’ll have disability advocacy groups up your arse on behalf of autistic people and others with social anxiety.

            • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              when I recently went back to using a staffed lane, I told the folks I had anxiety about being in the lane, and the cashiers comforted me.

              I have social anxiety, practicing in the staff lane, has helped me with this. At least, in this small area of life.

              I get the point, but if a person doesnt ever push themselves, they wont grow.