

No. The closest thing is essentially a hallucinating facial recognition bot with a mounted gun. Dangerous but ultimately directionless, as facial recognition technology still makes huge mistakes.


No. The closest thing is essentially a hallucinating facial recognition bot with a mounted gun. Dangerous but ultimately directionless, as facial recognition technology still makes huge mistakes.


It doesn’t help that the people currently in charge are fucking stupid, trigger happy, and emotionally insecure.
More like somebody taught their calculator to spell OBOE ShOES. It’s still a calculator.


Is this some new money laundering thing? Are companies “buying in” to hobnob with other wealthy people? Is this just the latest Country Club or whatever?
I seriously don’t understand why all these companies are throwing money at a project that is almost assuredly going to “mismanage” it.


“Digg watches what 1,000 of the most thoughtful voices in AI are paying attention to, and ranks the stories they’re pointing at by what’s rising fastest,” Rose said.
…
It also uses AI from services such as xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic and Google Gemini to “classify public accounts, summarize public posts and linked articles, describe public media, generate topic labels, score public content and power search.” That would explain how Digg quantifies user sentiment into a percentage for its posts.
Focus on AI. AI apologists from Xitter. Powered by AI summarizers.
Barf.
It’s worse than that. Not only are people going with the AI Overview as gospel, the search results themselves have nothing to do with the normal SEO that’s been the standard for the last 20+ years. People are picking the AI Summary, because the search itself is fundamentally broken.
Gone are the days that website content + traffic determine the order or relevance. Now websites have to include specifically formatted fluff that the AI summarizers like in order to show as relevant results. Just ask Louis Rossman.