

Yep, synthetic benchmarks aren’t worth much outside of theoretical performance. Test a complete system as you can actually buy it and with an actual real-life workload - i’m sure the performance will still be good, but nowhere this outstanding.
Avid PC gamer, Linux convert, SCP fan.
Love Science Fiction, Cyberpunk, post-apocalyptic settings; Fan of the games of the defunct Arkane Studios. Listening to (Power-, Speed-, Thrash-)Metal, Gothic, Deathrock, EBM, Vaporwave, Lo-Fi; Classic and Musicals are fine too. Can’t stand Hip-Hop.
Owned by two cats, recently divorced, blessed with a personality disorder (AVPD) - pensioned (even the state has the opinion I’m a total wreck lol). This causes me to be unable to keep up personal connections and makes me ghost literally everyone, so if it happens to you, sorry in advance.
Chronically online.
Pro GenAI, but Anti-GenAI-Corpos; this technology should be available to everyone, which would only be fair since we all contributed to it. Datasets and Models should be under the jurisdiction of UNESCO, since they are literally the distilled cultural output of humanity.


Yep, synthetic benchmarks aren’t worth much outside of theoretical performance. Test a complete system as you can actually buy it and with an actual real-life workload - i’m sure the performance will still be good, but nowhere this outstanding.


I remember my ex-wife telling me something similar - i wasn’t even a very good husband because of my psychiatric issues which weren’t fixable, but i gave her attention and wanted her to feel good. Seemingly the average hubby is failing even at this if the feedback she got back from her friends and colleagues was worth anything.


Don’t worry too much about the instances, for the most part they are not that important. There are a few outliers tho:
There are also a bunch of outlaw instances, either far-right or tolerating CSAM. These you can only stumble upon if you actively search for them - they are defederated in a pretty coordinated effort, simply because due to the way lemmy works, their content would be replicated, creating a legal nightmare, and of course no respectable admin wants to touch that stuff.
I am not being obtuse. There are tons of cultures not following your name schema. It makes people moving from one country to another a pain in the ass.


I actually got everyone i know to using signal, because i am simply not reachable by other messengers. That made these people use signal to chat with each other, which in turn made parts of their friend network join - it was interesting to see the “network effect” occurring on a small scale.


Yep, the only difference is the speed people can understand and follow instructions, which goes down with age. But technical affinity is not age related.
Ah, you are counting middle names. The one i know exactly noone actively using. I have one too! But the amount of people knowing it is around 7, and most of them will already have forgotten it.
This makes everyone’s name they have to use in basic situations increase in size by about 50%. I can’t see many people being happy about that change.
i do not know what you are calculating here.
You need 21500 names for the last name “Smith” alone without any homophones messing everything up. There is no second “500”.
Edit: unless you mean forcibly reassigning last names. That will go down real smooth mate, go for it lol


Yeah, there haven’t been many titles appearing in the last years. VtMB2 was an utter disappointment (no shade on The Chinese Room tho, they did the best they could with the clusterfuck they got dumped into their laps, look up Charlatan Wonder on YouTube to get a good overview). Abiotic Factor is pretty nice, and there have been some indie games trying to give us a worthwhile experience. I really hope the Ex-Arkane devs band together again to make something really nice for us.


Seems i am one of the ImSim-Minority here :-D


Doesn’t hinder Meta to match the data they acquire to the dormant account. They have an account for everyone - if you actually created one is not important.


I think so too - we and many others won’t have an issue getting whatever we need. But the broad masses might not, and this legislation also aims at things like repair instructions and tools to fix your shit thanks to Section 1201 of the DMCA.
Isn’t it great that he protects both Greenland AND pedophiles? Talk about being a protector!
Ehm i looked up the distribution beforehand, see my edit. These things are not distributed evenly - you have a few surnames with an insane amount in relation to any others before even coming to homophones which tilt the balance even harder towards those supercommon surnames. Smith and Brown are the ones you would have real issues if using the suggested unique name schemata.
Edit: There’s a whole another issue with this approach. If we do this on a per-country-basis, people moving into foreign countries will have to add the country of birth to everything, for example doctors appointments, for the rest of your life in case of a name collision. Making the system work worldwide will exacerbate the issue with very common surnames, because these are not only common in a single country. (Even in the DACH-area the name Schmid/Schmied/Schmidt and so on, which is simply the german form of Smith, is one of the most common surnames)


Next step is blocking access to foreign VPN providers. They are dumb fucks, but they are persistent dumb fucks.


This goes far deeper than just “piracy”. Everyone’s favourite section 1201 of the DMCA also means that this bill will result in the US blocking foreign sites which explain to you how to fix your shit if you have to bypass even the most inane digital lock.
Because you get issues with the most common last names in pretty much any language. Do you realize how many people out there have the same Last name? And does this system take into account homophones? Because if not, you didn’t actually gain any meaningful benefit out of this effort.
It would result in December babies being named 'Xyoabxoanz Smith" or similar.
Edit: just looked it up and did some napkin math. There were 2,369,644 Smiths in the USA alone in 2020. Half of them are women, and lets say about one third of them are in the age where they can have children, which leaves us with around 400k female Smiths in a childbearing age range. US fertility is at around 54 children / 1000 women / year, meaning you would have to assign around 21500 unique first names every year. This is before taking homophones to Smith into account, which will make the issue far worse. The user who said Unix Epoch would be his choice has a better system than this one could ever be.


I actually do not see any highlighting using Firefox / ff mobile. It also was pretty late when i posted it - changed it to quotes now


Changed it to quotes - it was late and i was pretty sleepy while doing this,sorry
Yes, standard violating content like ads for a play with content from Virginia Woolf. Feminism is for sure “standards violating content” in a fascist state.