The little things like: specific examples

The big things like: vague examples

To be fair, they are not making the law, nor are they making the punishment. They are only determining guilt. If that requires education, then it’s the courts job to do so during the trial so the jury can make an informed choice. And in the most extreme cases, all the jurors must come to a consensus - meaning that as a whole, the outcome is beyond reasonable doubt regardless of who is in the jury.

To do any less means to give certain individuals more power. And we have special cases for that too, as not everything requires a jury. So unless you’re willing to give up all power, this should be a sufficient balance of power.

Jury duty still sucks though.

The Brave Little Toaster Dildo

The only legitimate thing I can think of is that if we ever colonize the moon or mars, we are going to need compute and storage at the location. If we can launch equipment into orbit instead of waiting until it’s needed then it’ll give a headstart to test different solutions. If we can also figure out how to do that without having to build it or maintain it on the moon/mars, then that might result in less risk. But it’s all conjecture and you don’t know what you don’t know unless you try.