You don’t understand because you’re either not paying attention or because you’re trolling.
Random would be output like this:
Ostrich maypole dandy ironic. Great cucumber zebra!
Or this:
fhsjarbskzkdbsjzb kOdbg zkakfiebwkl
Random would be a password generator. Random would be utter nonsense. Incoherent. That’s not what LLMs produce.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
I agree that LLMs do not understand what it is they are predicting. At least no more than any other computer program “understands” its output. Which is to say: they are not conscious beings experiencing things.
This doesn’t mean LLM output is random. It means they aren’t thinking persons. You may have confused random with non-deterministic. LLMs are complex guessing machines that require a fudge-factor to produce meaningfully useful output. If the guesses were fully random then they’d have a significantly narrower field of practical applications.
Which means this image has to be of an enthusiast’s collection because Crystal Pepsi was only manufactured '92-'94 (and again briefly in 2016 and then again as a batch of 300 in 2022 during a promotional / competition).
It’s like a 90s themed couch potato weekend for time travelers.
The relaxed position of mammalian eyelids leaves them open. Muscles must contract for the eyes to be shut. Dead creatures cannot contract their muscles so their eyes remain open after they die.
You cannot shut their eyes for them by closing their eyes with your hand. Morticians place contacts in cadaver’s eyes while preparing the body for a wake. Those contacts grip the inside of the eyelids so that they remain closed.
This is why some cultures have funerary traditions in which objects are placed over the eyes.
TL;DR: you and your loved ones won’t close their eyes when they die.
Into the secret basement where the people who live under the floor are hiding. Better get a jack-hammer.
Irrelevant in the face of established cannon. If you’re going to make an in-universe argument then you have to stay inside the magic circle while making it.
This is like arguing Star Trek wrap drives wouldn’t work because our current understanding of physics means Alcubierre drives are impossible to operate. You’re applying a real-world understanding to a fictional universe that has written that part of reality away (for whatever reason).
The only point such an argument makes is that the arguer is ignorant of the source material.