

Yep, the dems need to hold him accountable. As do the beurocrats. They always seem to let him get away with it. It’s infuriating.
Vote.


Yep, the dems need to hold him accountable. As do the beurocrats. They always seem to let him get away with it. It’s infuriating.
Vote.


Yes, but selling the llms is not profitable either. They are burning through cash at extraordinary rates.
Even at highly subsidised rates, ai startups can’t make a profitable product. It’s nuts.


Yes, and both should be held responsible. The person or entity that instructed itz plus open ai for allowing its software to commit illegal acts with impunity.
It’s completely ridiculous that these companies are becoming a serious social problem, while at the same time not being held to the standards that other companies would be if they did these acts without the use of ai.
The agent did nothing. Software with ability to work independently gained access under instructions to get information. This is no different to telling an employee to get something in Coles and they steal it. Hold them both accountable.


I think relatively speaking, it is true. However, the reason we got trump 2 is they didn’t do their job the first time. The reason we got trump 1 is because they didn’t do it of Nixon.
It looked wrong as I wrote it. Thanks.