• 7 Posts
  • 59 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • Unless you’re a demented sociopathic corrupt rapist, running for office is very weird and difficult, not to mention mostly irrelevant to the job being run for.

    It’s understandable candidates want good advice from professionals who do this sort of thing. Sadly it usually tends to go poorly for the Democrats who inevitably try something they are recommended to be uniting or emphasizing some common ground that almost everyone hates for any number of reasons.

    And that’s before they get shafted by a publicity photo, a private photo, a misused audio track, or the propaganda arms of foreign states.

    Great political talents like Clinton, Obama, AOC and Mamdani are few and far between. It’s an open field but most don’t wanna get in there and those that do usually aren’t great at it.






  • Tap for Yeah but
    • regular group meetings - go or don’t. If you don’t like your meeting, find or make one you do like. Anybody saying different is wrong. There’s nothing in the big book that says you have to go to meetings. Good meetings are good. Bad meetings are bad.
    • social coercion tomodify behavior and create co-dependence on the group - It’s real simple, “don’t drink”. But if that hasn’t been working by itself, modifying one’s behavior is in fact the goal. “Coercion” and “co-dependence” should not be a part of it.
    • “Spiritual but not religious” … but actually being very religious. Before meds this was pretty much all there was. Groups are pretty varied as to how they handle this. But again, if your group is too Jesusy for you, or otherwise not your jam, find a different group. Anytime someone talks about Jesus or “God” I always think “Okay, good to know: don’t talk to them about that”. The only point is to allow that maybe your standard thinking patterns maybe aren’t the best authoritative source on how to not drink. Mostly because everyone got there by thinking that.
    • the removal of personal agency. No idea what that’s supposed to be. Are you referencing the “surrender” part of being alcoholic? If so that’s a truly misleading way to say it.
    • targeting vulnerable and desperate people This should never happen. It’s always wrong, never endorsed, never intended, never supported by anything about AA. Yes, people do it claiming to be AA but that’s the thing - it ain’t. Very specifically.

  • It’s not unheard of, but if AA is a cult it’s the dumbest cult ever invented. No dues, go/don’t go, do the steps (“which are ‘suggested’”) or don’t, don’t give your right name - shit if all cults worked like that they’d have to invent something else.

    That said, some AA people are too Jesusy or big-book-y or frankly just bog standard racist or whatever and shouldn’t be held as representative.

    It’s the case that a lot of people self-medicate with alcohol, then give up alcohol and don’t address the reason they were self-medicating appropriately. Basically becoming sober-and-unmedicated. Which ain’t great.

    AA is from the 1930’s when the options were death, jail, or an insane asylum. It’s right to adapt it in places for what works best. People first coming in need solid, decent people to just be there and hang out. But that’s all. After about the first year more-or-less it can become what the person wants out of it.

    But this place that Carr was a part of? That’s super fucked up.






  • Signed, very good. No details other than they plan to build more bases there. That’s going to be expensive and pointless, but ok.

    In Copenhagen, 40-year-old barber Gavin Sharpe told AFP: “It’s just the same situation.”

    He believes that Trump’s messaging was meant to win over US voters, adding that “I think it is exactly the same deal they had before.”

    . . . Under a 1951 defense pact updated in 2004, Washington was already able to ramp up its military presence on the island provided it informed Denmark and Greenland in advance.

    Yeah, there’s language that a non-NATO, non-EU country can’t build military bases there, so, uh, win. I guess? But as an agreement, the whole thing’s a big puffy nothing. Unless there’s something in the other 9 pages that’s a real shocker.




  • This is from 3 days ago:

    President Donald Trump announced on Friday that the United States has reached an agreement with Denmark and Greenland to give the US “permanent control over security, and all other needs,” in Greenland, which is a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark home to 56,000 people.

    “This is an “Infinite Life” Agreement, there is no end!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “From now on, no U.S. adversary can EVER have a base in Greenland, have a military presence in Greenland, or make sensitive investments in Greenland, without our express written approval.”

    The agreement has not yet been signed, and little is known about it beyond Trump’s social media posts. Denmark and Greenland said on Saturday that any ​agreement with the United States would not compromise Greenland’s sovereignty. And Trump’s words about expanding American military presence in Greenland may not mean much, considering that the US military already enjoys sweeping access to Greenland under a treaty that dates to the 1950s. Service members are, in fact, the single largest group of Americans currently present in the territory.