• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle


  • I think I’m just in a mood recently. If it were possible and the leadership weren’t incompetently failing upward, I feel like big corps would happily band together to subsidize the entire grocery industry if it could keep their own employees poor, dependent, and powerless.

    I’m not saying it couldn’t work, even in the US. I’m just saying to make sure your measures are air-fucking-tight and not manipulated by industry when they are being decided.



  • If this were done, I wouldn’t be surprised if every industry did everything in their power to manipulate the specific qualifying items used to generate the measure in order to keep wages as low as possible.

    Like if the price of a gallon container of milk were to be the measure, the industry would start selling milk by the liter and limit galon containers to special sales where it cost $0.05, but each store only had a stock of 5 units on January 1st.

    Some bullshit like that.




  • theparadox@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Wow!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Meanwhile I ask Gemini “Hey Gemini, can this Google product do X?”

    It responds "Here is a list of features for Google’s Product:
    … Does W! Does X! Does Y! …

    Me: clicks source for listed feature X… gets sent to post on Product’s support forum: “Can Product do X?” “No, it can’t do X.”

    Thanks Gemini!


  • All smart devices should fail into a safe and functional mode when the smart features inevitably stop working.

    I’m horrified that you could possibly advocate for allowing the consumer to have any real control of their own devices. Have you considered the security implications of not requiring devices to be 100% dependent on the manufacturer’s server? Users might be able to use the device without first installing the company’s app! The user might be able to use the device without the company knowing about it and selling that data for additional profit or using it to train it’s AI.




  • will be rewarded by being laid off. Not buying it only punishes the shithead management

    While I agree with the sentiment, that’s a gross oversimplification.

    • While I’m sure the studio will likely downsize and lay off staff, many will stay on.
    • Passion and care inevitably went into the game, to some degree. I would be surprised if devs and artists were indifferent to its success, whether they kept their jobs or not.
    • It’s hugely different to be laid off after a hit game vs a failure of a game, when it comes to finding new work.
    • The art itself, if it was of any quality, is wasted.

    Again, I’m not advocating people buy it. I just wish we had the power to fight some other way. I won’t be buying it, but I wouldn’t have bought it anyway. It will also very likely sell like hotcakes, regardless of our posturing.




  • I visited a flea market today - a big one in my region - for the first time in a very long time. To my horror, it was 50% TEMU trash - all sales final. It was selling. It made me really, really sad. People buying cheap shit online, marking it up, and selling it to their neighbors. Maybe there is some not-garbage in there but a huge portion of it is just going to fail and end up in a landfill in a year… and this is becoming normal for these people. Things just wear out rapidly and get thrown away and they buy a replacement.

    We’re killing each other and destroying ecosystems and the climate… so that we can make… this. We’re fucked.



  • It was actually forced onto the US by a clever US politician, Bruce Lehman - the Assistant Secretary of Commerce and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks under Bill Clinton, who pushed it into an international treaty, the WIPO Copyright Treaty. Europe also approved the treaty and I assume the European counterparts still stand.

    The WIPO Copyright Treaty is implemented in United States law by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). By Decision 2000/278/EC of 16 March 2000, the Council of the European Union approved the treaty on behalf of the European Community. European Union Directives which largely cover the subject matter of the treaty are: Directive 91/250/EC, creating copyright protection for software; Directive 96/9/EC on copyright protection for databases; and Directive 2001/29/EC, prohibiting devices for circumventing “technical protection measures”, such as digital rights management (also known as DRM).

    Maybe it isn’t so thoroughly abused over there though. Poor Europeans lack the highly sought after freedom (to lose all of your rights to mega-corporations) we enjoy in the USA.