It’s the latest instance of “misaligned” activity confirmed by the company as concerns about AI risks grow.

  • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    Right? Either they’re lying for market share, doing it intentionally for market share, or they’re grossly incompetent at sandboxing an instance. Either way, blame can’t be assigned to an agent. If it can, our world is headed for a very dark place. Blame should be assigned to the individual or company using the agent.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Blame should be assigned to the individual

      String up individuals, if the ‘company’ is responsible (screw that they’re legal people BS), then no-one is, and the fine is just the cost of doing nasty business.

    • boonhet@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      How do you propose someone “sandboxes an instance” of a tool with Internet access (without which it wouldn’t be particularly useful)?