• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sometimes people exaggerate tremendously about “a couple of blocks” in my experience. And it could also involve crossing some very busy intersections.

    Or this person is just a moron, that’s also an option.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah I was out of town for work in St Louis and got sick, went to the urgent care clinic and got a scrip, the pharmacy was “across the street” - and it was - just the street was 6 lanes of traffic with a concrete divider and no pedestrian crossing. In the end my sick ass dodged cars and climbed the barrier, risking my life, especially as I wasn’t feeling well. But I probably should’ve called an Uber.

    • troybot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      There are lots of people who don’t realize the word “couple” means two. Like they ask me for a couple of something and I give them exactly two and then they are confused because they expected several more.

              • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It’s the phrase “a couple of blocks” that was under discussion. And then “ask me for a couple of something and I give them exactly two.” Couples of people didn’t arise until you shoehorned them in.

                • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  No, I asked a question about couples as an example. It really doesn’t matter though, a couple of blocks, and a couple of people are still only two of each of those things.

              • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                7 hours ago

                how often have you referred to a romantic couple as “a couple of people”. What if I say “A couple of people attended my party”, does that mean a romantic couple showed up and no one else?

                  • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    7
                    ·
                    7 hours ago

                    take it up with merriam-webster, an institution tracking how people use words and phrases

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                When referring to a romantic partnership it would just be “a couple”, not “a couple of people”. The latter would be interpreted as a group of several where I am.

        • cuerdo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          but the amount 2 matches both definitions, so he is clearly dealing with morons

          • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I didn’t say they were wrong, just that they are a pedant. If people consistently ask you for “a couple of X”, and you give them 2, and they are always confused, maybe it’s not that the people are stupid, but that you are communicating badly on purpose to feel superior

            • cuerdo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              why would they be confused if they receive 2 things? a couple of means in any case 2 or more.

              • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I know Lemmy is basically just Reddit and thus full of pedants who think they are smarter than the average person. But you need to realise that 99% of people out there don’t think of 2 items when thinking about “a couple of things”. In my 15 or so years of knowing English, I’ve never encountered a use of “a couple of” where the speaker meant exactly two. So yes they are correct technically, but at the same time just communicating poorly

                • livingheart@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  sounds like your English teacher taught you wrong, as a joke.

                  a couple of blocks means two or three blocks, and more likely two.

                  if I was looking for something “a couple of blocks away” and still hadn’t seen it by the fourth, I’d assume the directions were wrong or I’d got lost.

                • alpine_jim@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  yes we do think of two things (maybe three) when someone says “a couple of things”.

                  that’s a totally normal interpretation.

                • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I’m on your side against atomicblocks, but in my 65+ years of speaking English I have been in many, many situations where “a couple” of things meant exactly two. Even situations where the exact number is quite important but also familiar and understood, like “take a couple of aspirin” or “I hitched a couple of horses to the wagon.” But also many situations where it meant a small handful or the exact number wasn’t important. Both uses are acceptable but “a few” or “some” or “several” are preferable if it’s three or more. People who ask for “a couple” while expecting more are pretending to themselves and you that they aren’t being greedy.

                  The person you called a pedant is merely literal-minded.

                  • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Maybe the generally accepted definition of “a couple of things” changed throughout the years. I am not exaggerating when I say I’ve never heard it used to refer to exactly two things, neither in English nor in my native language where there exists an equivalent phrase. But if you say that you have heard it that way, then so be it. Not to say you’re old or anything, but English did change a little bit since 65+ years ago. I don’t really understand where all the people arguing against a contemporary dictionary came from but it is quite entertaining :D

                    I’m not arguing that “a couple of things” can never be two, but that its pedantic to expect everyone to think it means “exactly two”, when clearly that isn’t the case, as proven by dictionaries. Language changes, and it’s ridiculous to stand your ground and say “No! ‘Couple’ means two, so ‘a couple of’ must also mean two of!”. It’s like redirecting a river with traffic signs, you can try but it’s not gonna change how the phrase is used in modern, contemporary English.

                    Honestly for a moment I thought I was taking crazy pills in this thread. I had to show this to a couple people to make sure I’m not completely out of touch, but they all confirmed that “a couple of” is usually more than two. Idk why people on here are so argumentative about this :D

                    And yeah, atomicblocks was just fighting ghosts. Idk what they thought this was about, but they just didn’t seem to understand what was being discussed. Oh well, just another pointless argument on the internet

                • naught@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  FWIW I’ve had this utterly engrossing and important discussion with numerous friends, family, and acquaintances. We arrived at:

                  • Couple = 2 (max 3, rare, not ideal)
                  • 2 <= Few <= 3 (max 4 depending on context, but you’re pushing it)
                  • 4 <= Several <≈ 10
          • Lauchmelder@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            where are you all getting those numbers from? If you ask me for a couple of pens and I give you four pens, would you even notice in that moment and be weirded out?

            Edit: And what do you mean “even if that were true”, my brother in christ this is a contemporary dictionary. This is how people use the phrase

        • Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          7 hours ago

          a couple of phrase : two (things) or if you are intellectually challenged a few (things).

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And depending on the age of the kids, letting your kids walk even a couple of blocks could be enough to get the cops and CPS called on you. Unfortunately, the days of letting your kids roam freely outside are over.

        • athatet@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Damn. Shoulda picked a better spawn point during characheter creation. Mah bad.

          • Asetru@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I mean, yeah, it’s not that simple per se. But still, people from the US generally have a lot of options. Just did a quick check and for Germany, up to 90 days don’t even require a visa. If you want to stay longer you still can just get here, announce your intent to stay within the first week and then sort things out. I’m not saying it’s easy, but it’s definitely more doable than for a lot of other places.

            • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              “Just quit your job and have enough money to travel outside the country even though you’ve never had that much money in your life and then overstay your visa in a country in which you don’t speak the language and are definitely not going to be able to use your degree… it’s totally doable!”

              WTF?