Judging by how cowbee plays very loose with facts and is incredibility ideologically bias I will not waste my time reading their propaganda list. Ive already read enough commie theory and its just not convincing. Its a child’s view of the world in my opinion.
I don’t “play very loose with facts,” it would be great if you could provide an example we could talk about but as it stands that’s needless slander. Further, calling it a “propaganda list” is a bit silly, like the links to Prolewiki for the Marxist-Leninist theory of nations and self a determination, the reading list I made is not a history list or anything, just works from major Marxists and Marxist-Leninists to explain the 3 major components of Marxism-Leninism: dialectical and historical materialism, the Marxist view of economics, and scientific socialism.
There aren’t really facts to dispute here, that’s like calling someone recommending Plato’s The Republic untrustworthy for understanding Plato. That’s pretty silly IMO.
You are playing loose with the facts right here. You trying to claim “Cowbee’s Leftist Theory Syllabus” isnt a propaganda list. The historical revisionism and inaccuracies in some of the books there are pretty well known.
But these are a tiny portion of the overall list, which is overwhelmingly theoretical, be it in the area of philosophy, economics, or scientific socialism. I specifically kept historical works outside of the scope of this list. Do you have specific, concrete issues with any of the above texts, or the others in the actual list, on the basis of historical revisionism/inaccuracy?
Judging by how cowbee plays very loose with facts and is incredibility ideologically bias I will not waste my time reading their propaganda list. Ive already read enough commie theory and its just not convincing. Its a child’s view of the world in my opinion.
I don’t “play very loose with facts,” it would be great if you could provide an example we could talk about but as it stands that’s needless slander. Further, calling it a “propaganda list” is a bit silly, like the links to Prolewiki for the Marxist-Leninist theory of nations and self a determination, the reading list I made is not a history list or anything, just works from major Marxists and Marxist-Leninists to explain the 3 major components of Marxism-Leninism: dialectical and historical materialism, the Marxist view of economics, and scientific socialism.
There aren’t really facts to dispute here, that’s like calling someone recommending Plato’s The Republic untrustworthy for understanding Plato. That’s pretty silly IMO.
You are playing loose with the facts right here. You trying to claim “Cowbee’s Leftist Theory Syllabus” isnt a propaganda list. The historical revisionism and inaccuracies in some of the books there are pretty well known.
Really? Which books? Considering the list linked is just Marxist-Leninist theory, and not a history list, that sounds pretty incredible!
If I’m being charitable, you could be referring to the following few works if you really stretch:
US Interventionism, the Third World, and the USSR - M. Parenti (1986)
Webpage Transcription of Speech | Original Speech [~1 hr / 1 hr 33 min]
Imperialism, the Current Highest Stage of Capitalism - V.I. Lenin (1916)
Webpage | Audiobook [~3 hr / 4 hr 20 min]
The Imperialist Partition of Africa - W. Rodney (1970)
Webpage | Audiobook [~20 min / 25 min]
But these are a tiny portion of the overall list, which is overwhelmingly theoretical, be it in the area of philosophy, economics, or scientific socialism. I specifically kept historical works outside of the scope of this list. Do you have specific, concrete issues with any of the above texts, or the others in the actual list, on the basis of historical revisionism/inaccuracy?