• Ekpu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    OK Spain. Instead of Archive.today what about those AI companies? I heard they used copyright material…

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    22 hours ago

    TL;DR It’s copyright.

    Apparently the archive’s crawlers have been able to access material that is paywalled in a regular browser and that’s got copyright holders’ panties in a bunch.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Specifically, in order to protect paywalls, not because Archive.Today did anything nefarious.

    • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      not because Archive.Today did anything nefarious.

      They did though and should be banned for that. Got to the right answer for the wrong reasons.

  • hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    That only incentivizes people to use Tor more ,to get around bullshit bans. Nothing can truly be banned if you know the minimum necessary to “unban” yourself.

    Edit: Just for shits and giggles https://archive.ph/RqoaB