there’s nothing about ai in that article. also there’s no ethical, legal or moral issue with the kind of machine learning systems used for medicine. calling it ai to begin with, and thus conflating it with language modeling, a tech it has basically nothing in common with, cheapens both the tech and the term.
Calling people pedophiles when you disagree with them does too. Is this becoming another god damn social cult with the gatekeeping and the echo chambers and the purity testing and the tunnel vision and the groupthink and the high horsing and the
Man, it must be unpleasant to have to keep making the distinction that you have chosen not to use it for the child porn. How sad must it be to be unfairly included in such a henious group as… um… twitter users…?
But hey, at least you have that going for you. I’ll just make a quick note in the huge database we keep to track all you pro-AI types (so we can better conspire against you): “Bananarchy69 insists they’re using the child porn machine for good, and not for making child porn. Look at the dial on the control panel, they clearly have it turned all the way to ‘cure cancer’ and not ‘make child porn’”. See now, it’s all good! And now you can leave in peace, sure in the knowledge that nobody would ever think you doth protest way too much.
there’s nothing about ai in that article. also there’s no ethical, legal or moral issue with the kind of machine learning systems used for medicine. calling it ai to begin with, and thus conflating it with language modeling, a tech it has basically nothing in common with, cheapens both the tech and the term.
Calling people pedophiles when you disagree with them does too. Is this becoming another god damn social cult with the gatekeeping and the echo chambers and the purity testing and the tunnel vision and the groupthink and the high horsing and the
you mean the response is unfounded?
Yes calling people you disagree with pedophiles, like what happened to me in this thread, is weak and childish and straight up dangerous.
that’s not what i asked.
My goodness, my pearls!
Man, it must be unpleasant to have to keep making the distinction that you have chosen not to use it for the child porn. How sad must it be to be unfairly included in such a henious group as… um… twitter users…?
But hey, at least you have that going for you. I’ll just make a quick note in the huge database we keep to track all you pro-AI types (so we can better conspire against you): “Bananarchy69 insists they’re using the child porn machine for good, and not for making child porn. Look at the dial on the control panel, they clearly have it turned all the way to ‘cure cancer’ and not ‘make child porn’”. See now, it’s all good! And now you can leave in peace, sure in the knowledge that nobody would ever think you doth protest way too much.