

This would probably be really sound if the only thing I’d ever read was Mao’s quotations and I didn’t have any historical knowledge either.
Here’s a cool video for you to argue against
Here’s some words for you to misunderstand


This would probably be really sound if the only thing I’d ever read was Mao’s quotations and I didn’t have any historical knowledge either.
Here’s a cool video for you to argue against
Here’s some words for you to misunderstand


Sure, lets pretend you didnt mean it with that connotation.
You engaged in ableism, calling me “incapable”
Right… So is this really the level of conversation where you feel the most comfortable? Must be, since you insist to drag it down to here.


I don’t appreciate the sexist condecention
it’s getting past the fundamentalist zealotry that clouds better judgement.
Well, I’m glad you’ve at least managed to gain some introspection


What? Try to read what I actually wrote my guy. You dont want to applaud any wars, right? So I must assume youre not applauding Ukraine for fighting back. After all if they just didnt fight back, there wouldnt be a war. We don’t want to applaud people doing war. We don’t want to applaud war. It’s the war part, specifically, completely removed from context. Thats all that matters apparently.


Then yes. Been a bunch of years though and the translation seemed shoddy.


Maos quotations?


So you’ve been arguing with a child this whole time? Lmao what a loser you are
Anyway. I think you forgot the “… and here’s why you are” part. But you are quite forgetful, like how you constantly forget what I write and respond to something I didn’t! Or like when you forget to respond to parts of what I write! Whoops there came some the reasons why again, my bad


Removed by mod


Removed by mod


“blind following” Yeah alright, sorry for reading something, relating it to what I know, investigating its claims, find them to be well-founded and the arguments to stand up to reason, and therefore I decide to incorporate it into my worldview. I suppose a much better method would be to read falsehoods written by someone the CIA decided to fund or whoever you want.


The democrats are not principled leftists. Your analogy does not work.


Lenin said principled leftists parties could make use of elections as a way of gaining more popular support. The democrats are not principled leftists.


Okay this might be difficult to understand, but the people who didnt vote for Kamala because of her many issues also didnt vote for Trump due to his many issues.


See you donkeyfucker (I have proof that you fuck animals, just look through my comment history)


Alright, after seeing this piss -poor attempt of yours to write anything of substance, dont bother replying to my other comment, you’re clearly incapable.


Well its not one question, its a bunch lumped together.
Sure
No. Israel is enacting an actual genocide against a defenceless population, the genocide has been going on since 1947 and has drastically accelerated these last few years.
While there are many accusations of genocide against Russia, its pretty clear (as has been thoroughly investigated by international observers - whom have been allowed to investigate, unlike in Israel) that, while there are civilian casualties, the goal of the russian military is to win a war against Ukraine, not exterminate a people.
Honestly, this one is tough. I feel like it was wrong, but I understand why Russia did it - the NATO posturing, the brinksmanship, the constant breaches of treaties… At a certain point one has to ask what else Russia could do. Now I know how you’re going to take this “OH SO YOU SUPPORT RUSSIA YOU CONDONE AHHH” but really if you actually read what I write, then that’s not what I am saying. I am saying, given russias position, russias interest in remaining a sovereign country, the threat against Russia (perceived or real), the situation Russia was in was one where the only outcome given to it was invasion. Its not like it did not try diplomacy first.
Wait, aren’t you the zionist who couldn’t say Israel is committing a genocide? A classic zionist tactic is cheapening the word by using it to describe any hostile action. Im sorry, but between Russia and Ukraine, Russia is not the one who has systematically pursued an ethnic minority, banned the language of that minority, bombed the fuck out of areas with that minority and all that stuff.
Since I don’t see how Russia is committing a genocide (because genocide isn’t just “when you are at war” if that were the case then the Native Americans committed genocide against colonists in the 17- and 1800’s. I hope we can both see how ridiculous that is.) They are giving support to Russia, so they are complicit. Id like to know what makes the invasion of Ukraine less legal than other invasions before I agree on the “illegal” part.
Everyone Who Disagrees With Me Is A Foreigner.
This refrain of yours is so odd to me, because I never see you invokenit with people you agree with, despite the fact there’s also massive pro-us-regime botfarms.


Yeah, I don’t think I want to talk to anyone who applauds any wars.
Alright so you don’t want to talk to people supporting Ukraine either, then? I figure you get mad when you watch Saving Private Ryan or Inglorious Bastards? People who speak positively of the Vietnamese in their fight against France, Japan, France and the US are right out the window? Same goes for the houthis, right? All communist guerillas, I suppose. And freedom fighters through the years.


If you really want to own us and laugh at us then you should consider reading the texts in cowbees introductionary reading list that would really own him and be so funny!


I would assume the same that happened to the reddit Ukraine brigade.
I really don’t understand why you prefer this to actual conversation. You seem to care so much until the very moment anyone engages and then youre just… A puddle of clichéed disappointments