Sex toys don’t have a gender, what people enjoy doing with toys by themselves have literally zero bearing on their sexuality.

You can just as much enjoy using a dildo anally as a straight man as you can as a gay man.

Yes it does. It correlates with the unpopular vote winning, because votes aren’t evenly weighted across people.

It’s not that deep. It’s a joke satirising something that literally actually happens, it being over the top and not exactly like in reality is the point, because this is supposed to be, hold on to your hat, a joke and not a politcal science lecture.

Is Liz supposed to be a voter from Wyoming or the State of Wyoming itself? If the former, there should be like a dozen more people whose votes are worth less than her’s while still outweighing her total voting power.

Except several republicans have lost the popular vote and been elected president anyway, so clearly it’s entirely possible for Liz’s old shoe meal to outvote everyone else, if she’s in the minority.

It’s not a euphism, it developed in the English language because the aristocracy, which could actually afford meat and ate it regularly, spoke french, therfore using french terms for the meat e.g. Porcine -> pork or Bœuf -> beef ) wheras the farmers who actually raised and dealt with the animals, but rarely if ever could actually afford to eat them, used anglo saxon to refer to them, hence this dichotomy in names for meat vs. animal in English.

It has nothing to do with being a euphism. It’s also evident that the cheapest meat, and pretty much the only one that even peasants could somewhat regularly afford, chicken, did not undergo this split.