They’re already included in that statement, it’s only barely a dogwhistle, almost a regular one.

If you have any small wounds, e.g. in your gums, mucosa, etc, yes there are.

I wasn’t really disputing the numbers per se (although I do actually find it hard to believe 17% of workers pay for AI subscriptions…) but more wondering about, given that their combined revenues are somewhere around 50 billion USD, what the consequences of such a large fraction of that coming from heavily subsidised consumer use would be.

These numbers seem somewhat mysterious to me, this would account for like 2-3% of all anthropic+openai’s revenue. I’m not sure exactly what that would mean but that can’t be good (for those companies) given how much those subscriptions are subsidised.

Big same

That’s not really what’s described by “delimiting” and especially not by “configuring the width”. Which are features of tabulations.

And it’s Linux where line feed is carriage return and line feed together (down a line and back to the start) while Windows separates those and is historically consistent (although that’s been clunky for a long time).

Ya got wooshed mate

They are a tool but they aren’t really like any other. They’re only rarely useful and have massive negative externalities.