Which is why it’s a shame to see you fight each other as if that isn’t the case.

I would wholeheartedly recommend reading How To Win Friends And Influence People (or at least this summary). Especially if you’re trying to convince people to vote in the midterms.

  • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Why go against Trump when you can slander democrats and advertise third parties that have no chance to begin with?

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      To add, in 2024 the 3rd party candidate with the most votes was magician Jill Stein, who magically appears right before elections, then magically disappears again afterward. And she got a whopping half of a single percent of the total votes cast.

      So yeah, ain’t no 3rd party going to win a federal election anytime in the near or remote future. And ain’t no 3rd party even really trying. So why fucking vote for them?

      • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was thinking about this a lot recently when wasting my time arguing some tankies. Imagine a 3rd party candidate somehow magically won the presidency. Now they face a house and senate stacked with Rs and Ds. The president would be completely paralyzed their whole term, not achieving any of their lofty goals. So the 3rd party would have to get house and senate too. I never even see anyone campaining for these positions as a third party, and so there’s just absolutely no credibility in any alternative candidates. Why the fuck even talk about any 3rd party candidates? Just hold your nose and vote the fucking D even if you don’t like the candidate.

        • LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          They admitted in court that it’s not a democratic process so they couldn’t be held to that standard.

          Also, I have heard zero talk from them about transitioning from a republic to democracy, so they are also republicans as I see it.

          Words can be hard. I get it.

          • Voixe2@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Good thing lemmy isn’t a courthouse so we say words with the intention of understanding instead of debate :3

            • LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I would say that we’re living in a truthy alternative facts America, where nothing is defined, everything is a pejorative, and it’s not just Trump.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Words can be hard. I get it.

            This coming from the person who apparently thinks political party names are literal. Do you think the nazis were socialist? It’s in the name so it must be true!

            • LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You do not capitalize the word democrat unless you’re talking about members of a corporate controlled party within the United States. What’s so hard to understand?

              Do you really see the idea as exclusive to you? I get it. Americans don’t see democracy as universal, just some selective cudgel you weaponize to steal natural resources. It’s not. It’s a universal human right that we all are entitled to.

              Democrats are not democratic. They just aren’t.

              • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Right. My point is that political parties very often don’t operate the way their name might suggest. Assuming Democrats would have internal processes that are democratic is, unfortunately, not a safe assumption to make.

                Edit: Reread the thread. I guess that means your original comment was right. I still think it’s dumb to insist on using “nicknames” like “Demo©®at” though, and especially when you’re discussing the meaning of words it only serves to confuse the conversation, because you’re actually referring to the entity that everyone else would just call “Democrats”. It’s unclear what distinction is being made.