• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Oh wait for it. It’s not even close to how high it will get once Iran times another closure of the Hormuz strait for maximum impact for the midterms

    • kofe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m worried there will be some fucked up deal to have it suddenly all at least temporarily under control within the weeks ahead, getting Republicans favor again.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is COMMUNISM! As a Voter in Louisiana I OVERWHELMINGLY voted for EXACTLY these Gas Prices! It’s a SMALL Price to PAY to make sure Iran, who had NO Nukes or INTEREST in getting Nukes before Trump bombed them, has NO Nukes!

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So what prevents the rest of the states from declaring a state of emergency and voiding the 24.4 cents for diesel, and 18.4 cents for standard fuel that is taxed by the federal government?

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I get wanting to make fun of them but there are ways to reduce fuel prices via a state of emergency, don’t get me wrong it’d hurt like a bitch but you could do it.

        • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What are you on about? You seem to show the same lack of civics knowledge as the person I replied to. Do you understand what federalism is?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I was moreso referring to work from home mandates, and putting in incentives out to reduce the amount of trucks on the road stuff like that. I legit don’t see what relevance fuedalism has in this situation since that’s basically irrelevant to things like price controls.

            • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I was moreso referring to work from home mandates, and putting in incentives out to reduce the amount of trucks on the road stuff like that. I legit don’t see what relevance fuedalism has in this situation since that’s basically irrelevant to things like price controls.

              I see you did as well in reading and spelling as you did in civics.

              • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Nah, just have a brain fuck of a migraine, I’d rather be safe with superfluous apostrophes than fuck up a sentence completely.

                Regardless nothing about what I said is impossible, unwarranted, or unprecedented. Frankly it’d be better to take proactive measures to reduce fuel prices or at least reduce fuel consumption than risk economic collapse because no one can due interstate trade outside of the rails which would bottleneck badly. Don’t think anyone wants the fuel crisis from the 70s back, but we may not have much of a choice given current circumstances.